DC: Freedom & Linux

September 21, 2008

Is Ubuntu about to become yet another restrictive commercial OS?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , — darthchaosofrspw @ 12:41 AM

Canonical, the parent company of Ubuntu, recently announces they will be selling licenses for popular multimedia codecs such as MP3 playback and DVD playback. Will these licenses eventually be incorporated into the OS itself and turning Ubuntu away from its philosophy of “using only free software” into yet another commercial product and banning free redistribution?

Ubuntu has been successful because of the following points:

  • It is free to download.
  • It is free to use.
  • You are free to make copies of it and redistribute it for non-profit purposes.

Are we headed for a future where Ubuntu will no longer be free to download, and you will no longer be allowed to make copies of Ubuntu and redistribute it even for non-profit purposes?

http://ostatic.com/173388-blog/canonical-opens-codec-sales-and-potential-can-of-worms#rss

Canonical Opens Codec Sales and Potential Can of Worms

Written by Kristin Shoemaker – Sep. 18, 2008

This week, Canonical opened sales of legal multimedia codecs and DVD playback software to all Ubuntu users, regardless of whether the distribution was pre-installed on a purchased system or downloaded gratis from an Ubuntu mirror.

Fluendo handles the bulk of the codecs using the GStreamer framework. CyberLink offers DVD playback through a Linux version of its PowerDVD software.

It feels the most positive word that can be applied to this announcement is “bittersweet.” There are many more colorfully negative words that are applicable, as well.

To be clear, it is certainly possible to get proprietary multimedia codecs and DVD playback capabilities running in Linux, free of charge. It’s actually fairly simple. And depending on the codec, or your country of residence, it could also be illegal.

It is hard to imagine that Canonical won’t get a certain amount of grief for this offering, and that doesn’t seem right. On the one hand, they aren’t able to legally redistribute these codecs. So instead, they’ve opted to open an area in the storefront that makes downloading and installing purchased codecs work similarly to installing with Synaptic. They’ve made it so that a complete reinstall of a system won’t require another codec purchase. They’ve made the best out of the situation.

Is there something inherently distasteful about needing this software in the first place? Is it troubling that a legally-procured DVD can’t be played, just as it is, in a computer’s DVD drive? Yes — a loud, emphatic yes.

But Canonical and Ubuntu — and ultimately Linux end users — don’t have a lot of great options, at least in the short term. Canonical could simply not offer the proprietary codecs at all. Users would either need to convert their media to open formats, acquire new media in open formats, or abandon the idea of listening or viewing media they’ve purchased on their Linux machines.

Realistically, of course, a far greater percentage of Linux users would do what is done presently. They have computers, they have media — and they want to use them. These users would continue to install the codecs despite local laws prohibiting their use.

Canonical surely realizes that there are many Linux users who will use the available gratis codecs they find online. They still opted to partner with Fluendo and CyberLink to offer proprietary codecs legally. Why?

They could have taken the approach that every last Ubuntu user is vested in the “free as in speech” aspect of open source and does not own a single piece of media in a proprietary format. That would have been seen through immediately as either a blatant lie or delusional thinking. Or they could have thumbed their noses at the intellectual property laws in several countries, and refused to offer a legal alternative on the grounds that the laws are simply restrictive and misguided.

The laws are misguided. They are restrictive. They are still legally binding, though, and it is not Canonical’s call to encourage (or require) that any Linux user violate them. For this reason, Canonical is doing the right thing in offering a legal alternative.

The bittersweetness? Some will see this as another example of how proprietary formats are hopelessly broken, defy the law, and use the freely available but legally questionable codecs without a word. There are others who will be reminded (or discover for the first time) that the laws governing technology and intellectual property need revision, and rather than circumventing the law, will push for change.

http://blog.canonical.com/?p=37

Codecs and DVD playback on Ubuntu 8.04 for all users

For the first time we are making codecs for media playback and a DVD player, from our partners at Fluendo and Cyberlink, available through the Ubuntu store. We have had relationships with these companies for a while and to date we have offered their products to our hardware partners as pre-install options.

Now though, we are making them available to all users. It is important to us that no matter how you choose to access Ubuntu, pre-installed or as a free download, that you can have a similarly rich experience. The vast majority of our current users will have installed Ubuntu themselves. These users should also be allowed legal DVD and media playback and so we have built a way of letting them do this.

We cannot ship codecs through the distro, as they are not free to redistribute. So we have built a restricted download area that is accessible through the store. Once purchased you can find your software here which will then install in the familiar hassle-free way that Ubuntu users appreciate. A pretty cool feature is that, should you wipe out your machine you can go back to the restricted download area and access your codecs again. Enjoy

Gerry Carr – Marketing Manager, Canonical

6 Comments »

  1. This seems like having no news, so we’ll make it up. How many times does Mark S. have to reiterate that Ubuntu will always be free?

    Ampers Taylor
    IT Journalist

    Comment by Ampers Taylor — September 21, 2008 @ 7:49 PM

  2. Shuttleworth can always sell out his principles. I’m just saying it’s a possibility that in the future, Ubuntu could go the commercial route. As it is, Ubuntu doesn’t get very much coverage in the mainstream media. In the mainstream media, all you see is “I’m a Mac” or “I’m a PC” with the rare mention of Linux every now and then. The corporate-controlled media doesn’t want the masses to know there’s a free alternative to Mac and Windows that is just as good as – and sometimes better than – Mac and Windows. The corporate-controlled media is really there just to get people to buy things.

    Comment by darthchaosofrspw — September 21, 2008 @ 11:13 PM

  3. [...] Chaos asks, “Is Ubuntu about to become yet another restrictive commercial OS?” Kristin Shoemaker at ostatic calls the development at Canonical “bittersweet.” [...]

    Pingback by Coderights » Blog Archive » What’s going on with Ubuntu? — September 22, 2008 @ 12:11 AM

  4. Codecs will be sold separately, for those who want to buy it. Ubuntu will always be free. That’s a promise. Everyone will leave Ubuntu if Canonical brake his promise.

    Comment by ubuntuway — September 23, 2008 @ 12:13 PM

  5. Right now when I try to run a DVD on ubuntu, it asks if I want to install a codec that may not be legal in my country. How long until ubuntu doesn’t make it easy to get the free codec and that box only gives an option to put in a credit card number? What happens after several upgrades in ubuntu, do I have to keep buying these codecs if I want the latest bug free version? Am I forever going to start paying this tax? Ubuntu doesn’t even get the money I’m paying. Personally I think Canonical should buy out fluendo, give it free in ubuntu and continue to sell it to other distros to make up the costs. But thats just me.

    Comment by John — September 23, 2008 @ 2:05 PM

  6. @John: Ubuntu doesn’t give you free proprietary codecs now. You only have to buy the codecs once or you can just use the illegal ones like everybody else.
    @Ampers Taylor: As long as silly IT journalist who has nothing else to write about keep on saying the opposite.
    @everyone else: This seems like a lot of speculation about nothing. You could already buy them. So the news of this event just seems to amount to a lot of FUD.

    Comment by Eddie Wilson — September 25, 2008 @ 5:02 PM


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.